CIxCONVERGENT
INTELLIGENCE

Adversarial system evaluation

Find how your
AI system fails
before someone
else does.

Fixed-scope adversarial testing for LLM applications, agents, tools, retrieval systems, and sensitive workflows.

Request a deployment review Inspect the method
Abstract blue contours crossed by a signal with an amber discontinuity, illustrating a change in system behavior.
BEHAVIOR / BOUNDARY / CHANGEIllustrative system signature

Time to evidence

5–10 business days

from scope to prioritized findings

Investment

Starting at $3,500

one fixed-scope engagement

What you receive

One bounded system.
Reproducible evidence.
Prioritized controls.

Inside the method

ILLUSTRATIVE SCENARIO / NOT A CLIENT RESULT

When yesterday’s context
becomes today’s authority.

A role instruction can outlive the conversation that introduced it. The review follows what persists, what it influences, and where a control belongs.

Surface
Agent memory / orchestration
Test focus
Persistence across context resets
Evidence standard
Recorded conditions. Repeatable runs.
Failure path

Content becomes authority

  1. 01

    User-supplied context includes a role instruction.

  2. 02

    The visible conversation resets.

  3. 03

    A later workflow accesses retained state.

  4. 04

    The earlier instruction influences a new action.Authority boundary crossed

Control to test

Authority is checked again

  1. 01

    Label the source and scope of retained context.

  2. 02

    Separate memory content from permissions.

  3. 03

    Check authority at the point of action.

  4. 04

    Require fresh authorization when scope changes.Verify under matched conditions

Every finding should show what was tested, what reproduced, and what remains uncertain.

About CIx

Independent practice.
Direct accountability.

The people performing the evaluation stay directly involved from scope through findings. Clear communication is part of the work.

  • Direct evaluator access
  • Evidence you can inspect
  • Explicit scope and limitations

Start a scoped review

Tell us what you’re deploying.

A short introduction is enough
to start the scoping conversation.

Do not include secrets, customer data, credentials, or regulated records.

Optional details deployment state, risk surfaces
Risk surfaces

Only include information you’re comfortable sharing.

Review scope is agreed before testing begins.

The review process

From scope to evidence.

  1. Agree the boundary

    Define the system, authorized access, testing conditions and relevant risks.

  2. Exercise the paths

    Follow instructions, memory, retrieval and tool use across the system.

  3. Reproduce the behavior

    Record conditions and distinguish repeatable failures from model variance.

  4. Return actionable findings

    Document observed behavior, impact, confidence, limitations and recommended controls.

Discuss your system

Privacy

Share only what is needed.

The inquiry form asks for your organization, email and a short description of your system. Deployment state and risk surfaces are optional. These details are for discussing the scope of a potential review.

Please do not include credentials, customer information, regulated records or confidential system details. Technical access is agreed separately.

Fonts and illustrations are served with the site. Form drafts are not saved to browser storage. Cloudflare processes request metadata and performance and security telemetry.

In this local preview, submissions are validated on this device, discarded after the response and never forwarded or stored. Live delivery is not enabled.

Terms

A clear starting point.

Submitting an inquiry starts a scoping conversation. It does not form an engagement or authorize testing.

Scope, access, delivery dates and fees are agreed separately. The starting price and typical timeframe depend on the agreed system boundary.

The scenario on this page is illustrative. It is not a client result or evidence of a completed test. Evaluation does not certify a system or guarantee complete security.